home | reference | forums | boisevoice
BNA Land Use Meeting
January 26, 2006
In attendance: bht, Jason, Asa, Emily, Amelia, Lupin, Neil, Ross, David, Caleb, Justin
bht summarizes the intentions of this first meeting:
- revisit the Albina Plan
- Albina Plan is basically law vs. Boise Plan which is less official, more like a neighborhood aspiration
- There are also Historic codes to take into consideration
Group go-around about what we all expect from this meeting:
- meeting with Mississippi Lofts was not productive
- having a common vision about the neighborhood can give us the opportunity for influence on new developments
- maybe come up with a new/updated Boise Plan to present to prospective developers
- this group can bring more power to the neighborhood
- a committee can better serve the neighborhood requests about development
- address issues of gentrification in Boise
- talk about triple bottomline approach to development: economic – environmental – social
- we can’t get everything we want from developers, but we can get some things.
- come up with a holistic list of neighborhood desires and proposals for how to get the things we want
- more cultural/economic diversity represented in businesses
- outreach to neighborhood about development
- make available the tools that let us know what is within our power (ie: ONI resources, NECN contacts, City Planning office)
- facilitate bridges between developers / business community / residents
- empower as many voices in the community as possible
- add some input from the formal aspects of urban design
- personal involvement in creating the future of our neighborhood
- form a database of developments for public access
- research the Albina Plan – individuals take on small bits of it and bring it back to the group at large
Agenda items:
- survey to pass out to residents bordering new development in the neighborhood
- mission statement / statement of purpose
- public database of all current and prospective developments
Discussion points for the future:
- field trip to the planning office in order to gather materials/information
- multilingual resources
- Albina Plan study group – maybe once a month use meeting for study group and once a month use meeting for general discussion
- issue about lots being split into 25x100
- development of Williams & Vancouver
- Mississippi Lofts
Mission Statement:
- maybe it should be more of a statement of purpose?
- could we use the online forums to discuss this?
- no, they’re broken
- Jason has a friend who might be able to fix them
- are we a committee that will be discussing all things related to the land (including greenspaces?) no.. we’ve talked about setting up a separate greenspace committee
- maybe we can do a go around, throwing out words that we would like to see included in a purpose statement:
- education, outreach, facilitation, jobs, equity, sustainability, sense of community, livability, economic diversity, inclusiveness, affordability, vision, Boise, fun, dynamic, realistic, pragmatic, consensus, empowerment, accountable, participatory, neighborhood values
- we could use some words from this list to form a survey – pass out a list of words to residents and ask them to build statements off of them…
- that sounds like too much work?
- maybe use the ‘word surveys’ for the greater BNA
- for now we will just email the words to everyone in this group and then folks can work on statements individually
Mississippi Lofts survey:
- purpose would be to gather an idea of what neighbors want in regards to the Miss Lofts development
- responsibility of BNA to reach out to the residents
- residents want to feel part of a process
- there is a stigma attached to the BNA for some people, so maybe we shouldn’t rep that group
- instead of abandoning the BNA, let’s just try to build a better rep
- can we write a survey that could be used for any development and word it in a way that allows people to be specific?
- let’s be careful about the wording – we don’t want to mislead people into thinking we can make huge change
- maybe if we all raise our voices we can make change?
- we need to find out a timeline for the Miss Lofts
- we are the goals for the survey? – just to have people’s voices down on paper
- neighborhoods can do their own master planning (?)
- we should have developers involved in drafting the questions
- we could do a survey for the “Mississippi Ave corridor” as a whole
- developers might feel defensive unless they are involved in some way – we should ask Ben Kaiser, Kurisu’s and Miss Lofts for input
- we shouldn’t focus on just one development
- maybe take note of demographics of those who respond to survey
- ask people to rate a series of “values” in order to guage what types of people are responding
- could we redo the survey asking what types of businesses people want to see on the street?
- how should we distribute? door-to-door asking question, or paper handouts
- possibly better responses from minority/low-income folks if it is done in person vs. white, middle-class written responses --- we could use both methods?
- involve youth in future surveys
- Amelia can look around at PSU for dot surveys
For the next meeting:
- individuals will work on survey questions and purpose statements
- Asa will begin to work on database of developments
- Amelia is a good resource to call on when we need more hands